65nm vs. 90nm: AMD's Athlon 64 X2 5000+ - PAGE 7
William Henning - Monday, June 4th, 2007

Related Articles

-- Article Quick Nav -- 1 - Introduction2 - Test Setup & Benchmarks Used3 - Business Winstone & Content Creation4 - Sandra Tests5 - RightMark Read & Write6 - RightMark Latency & Bandwidth7 - LAME MP3, TMPGEnc8 - Rendering Tests9 - Call of Duty & Commanche 410 - Doom 3 & Halo11 - Jedi Knight & UT200412 - Overclocking & Conclusion

LAME MP3

At stock speeds, the X2 5000+ beats the E4300, however it needs to be seriously overclocked to beat the E6300 and E6400 at their stock speeds.



As we've only recently started running the multi-threaded version of LAME, we only have a couple of results for you.



TMPGEnc

The AMD X2 5000+ managed to do very well at TMPGEnc at stock speeds, beating the E4300 and the E6300!

next: Rendering Tests »

« RightMark Latency & Bandwidth

send article   hardware newsletter   article comments (8)

Submit our article to: Digg this! del.icio.us