Wiki Tools:   view  edit  history

Professional Previews, Reviews, and Roundups

Average Review Score:
3.44/5.0

Reviews

website score publish date article quality
www.reviews.gaminghorizon.com 7.9/10 Aug 29 '05
www.gamingexcellence.com 7.1/10 Aug 20 '05
Game Chronicles Magazine 6.9/10 Jun 23 '05
GameAxis 4.9/10 Jul 08 '05
GameOver.net 72% Jul 08 '05
GameZone 8/10 Jun 20 '05
PCGamesSource 73% Jun 03 '05
Actiontrip 57% Jun 14 '05
EuroGamer 6/10 Jul 05 '05
Game Over 72% Jul 08 '05
GameSpot 6.7/10 Jun 02 '05
Gamespy 3/5 Jun 09 '05
IGN PC 8.5/10 Jun 01 '05
»Submit a review link

Previews
website publish date notes article quality
There are currently no previews. Click below to submit one.
» Submit a preview link


What They Say:
Check out these quotes from reviews & previews
"Essentially, while both sides of the game have their charms, it very much feels like a slightly awkward hybrid rather than the more integrated Total War."
"The game is flawed, simple as that."
"Imperial Glory proves to be an engaging title that develops the same ‘just one more turn’ syndrome that Total War and Civilization players often get"
GameOver.net
read the rest »
"Imperial Glory is a good Total War clone that packs a lot of unfulfilled potential."
"Imperial Glory is one frustrating game. It gets so many things right and it certainly looks the part, but fans of the genre -- especially those interested in Napoleon-era fighting -- will have a tough time getting around the game's lighthearted attempt at modeling combat. Hopefully Eidos will allow Pyro to fix what's broken, because the game is a handful of critical tweaks away from being something special. As it stands, it's tough to fully recommend Imperial Glory unless realism and unit management are low on your list of priorities."
Lowest Prices



Latest Headlines
New Articles
Latest Net Articles
(0.0598/d/nova)