Call of Duty: World at War

THE GOOD:
More perks that let you customize your character more, this includes things such as flamethrowers and tank perks.

More game modes such as capture the flag and war, a game type where you try to capture strategic positions

Co-op campaign, you can play the campaign with a friend over live or with a friend on the same console unlike Call of Duty 4

The campaign is fun to play and it makes you want to keep playing until it's done.

Great graphics that are very in depth

The guns are much more diverse then in COD4. There is more of a mix of bolt-action guns and automatics which makes the game more fun.

THE BAD:
The maps are a bit smaller and less diverse. They seem the same after the while and they grow boring.

The spawning system in multiplayer is very flawed and needs to be fixed.

For all it's worth, the campaign is rather short

SUMMARY:
Call of Duty 5 meets hype...

THE GOOD:
The Russians were my favorite group to fight as. We all know they were the country that truly defeated Hitler.

I loved nazi zombies. It was really cool but, kinda creepy.It was okay if you were playing it on multiplayer, but just downright creepy alone.

I liked the fact that there were so many nazis and a lot less Russians fighting them and they were still able to push threw there lines and defeat them. that is real funny in my opinion.

I loved that you got to use bayonets to stab the crap out of the Japenese soldiers cause I rushed them a lot. I liked the flamethrowers and the fact that you never run out of mm for them, especially love the ones on the tanks for close range.

THE BAD:
I didn't really like the mission "Blood and Iron" where your operating the tanks because you die way to easy for being in a tank.

For some weird reason a couple of the marine missions were really short. And I really don't...