| PAGES: 1 2 next» |
|
| |
pk_9584
|
Source? or 1.6? |
|
I have cs1.6 and i was thinking of getting source... i just wanted to no wat the difference is and if it s worth the price..
| |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
alecko91
|
re: Source? or 1.6? |
|
Source has better graphics, but I still prefer to play 1.6 due to gameplay.
------------------- | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
Overlord276
|
re: Source? or 1.6? |
|
Yea, source has better graphics, physics, and all that cool eye-candy stuff, but yea, like wut that guy above me said, gameplay is still in cs 1.6. Only get source when you get pro, cuz all the pro players are in source.
------------------- Antec 900 Q6600@ 3.2GHz EVGA 8800GT Akimbo 4Gb OCZ 500GB HDD EVGA 780I X-Fi Xtremegamer | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
sheepman
|
re: Source? or 1.6? |
|
Only get source if you are a noob because all the beginners play that version. Most 1.6 players purchased this game when it was the only version available, therefore have experience at the game.
------------------- Instead of the cross, the Albatross About my neck was hung. | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
AznLiquid
|
re: Source? or 1.6? |
|
Source really messed up CS. Not sure if these still apply, but when I played there were some terrible changes like:
head stacking removed smokes having delay before going off recoil super easy to control couldn't wall ------------------- | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
standard
|
re: Source? or 1.6? |
quote Overlord276*bleep*ing idiot. WRONG ------------------- ![]() | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
Entropy
|
re: Source? or 1.6? |
|
I personally prefer 1.6, as said above the overall gameplay appeals way more than Source's. Source managed to mess up just about everything that's good about CS; wallbanging, recoil, hitboxes and since a short while they even managed to completely rape the whole buying menu due to their 'real time economics'. It's a good idea but destroyed the weapons' balance. Furthermore, I just don't like it's feel. In my opinion, 1.6 feels smoother, and yes, I do get a decent FPS on Source, I'm in the upper 50-60's in general with everything maxed out. Source's players are overall less experienced, less mature (doesn't apply to all of course) and just no fun to play with. I especially love how anyone with a half-decent score is automatically a hacker in their eyes.
quote Overlord276Mind if I say I seriously lol'd really, really, really hard at that? Do you have any idea why there's no professional league for Source or self-respecting high-skilled clans for that matter? Exactly... ------------------- ![]() Props to my Americano Pimpa~ Tweaker, for being Neo's very own sexy d00d | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
AznLiquid
|
re: Source? or 1.6? |
quote Hitman3There are actually professional leagues for Source. CAL-Invite and CEVO-Professional are still around. Good teams like Check-Six, Hyper!, amog many more are still active, and will be playing Source for quite some time. I'm not defending this terrible game, just giving you some facts. ------------------- | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
Entropy
|
re: Source? or 1.6? |
|
Well yeah, I didn't know the exact names but I did know there was a professional league. My point however is that it's practically non-existent in comparison, the skill is relatively lower and the price money isn't quite as high either. From what I've seen, 5k is a lot for a Source-team while a 1.6 team can get 20k on most tournaments, if not more.
------------------- ![]() Props to my Americano Pimpa~ Tweaker, for being Neo's very own sexy d00d | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
G@n$^#aunwashed heathen
(guest) IP: Logged |
re: Source? or 1.6? |
|
1.6 is way better than Source who ever thinks Source is better than 1.6 is crazy!!!!!!!
| |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del report
| |
sharingan_sasuke
|
re: Source? or 1.6? |
|
i jst have cz(cs condition zero)and cs1.6 and i cant b arsed to buy source
------------------- [_,[][_,(lol)-.- ^.^
| |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
AznLiquid
|
re: Source? or 1.6? |
|
CZ actually had some pretty cool looking weapon skins and the hit boxes were actually alot more accurate. Way better than Source.
1.6>CZ>Source ------------------- | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
Strayfire
|
re: Source? or 1.6? |
|
Source is better for casuals and beginners, most hardcores play 1.6.
------------------- ![]() | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
SuPs05
|
re: Source? or 1.6? |
|
k i playd cs 1.6 for bout a year and it was MUCH HARDER then Source. wen i came 2 play source, headshots all ova. make sure that ur pc can run source2 cuz i know many ppl cant.
------------------- Pokemon Pearl Friend Code: Name: ~Nark~ 5069-4273-1321 Pokemon Platinum: Name: ~NarK~ FC: 3653 0938 9809 | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
Teh Renegade
|
re: Source? or 1.6? |
|
CS:1.6 is more of a competitive game and overall better than CS:S even though Source has better graphics is fairly easy to kill people though it lacks the better gameplay that CS:1.6 has.
Also it requires a good video card and graphics card to play, mainly a you need a pretty good computer to play CS:S while CS:1.6 you don't need that great of a CPU, but atleast have Cable Connection or you will be lagging as hell. Or heck get both for $20 at Steam-Powered.net or .com, but if you just want one and your a beginner head towards the CS:S. ------------------- ![]() Credit: SXH, thanks again | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
| [All dates in (PT) time] | Threads List « Next Newest Next Oldest » |
| PAGES: 1 2 next» |
Powered by neoforums v0.9.8b (equilibrium)
Copyright Neo Era Media, Inc. 1999-2009