|
| |
edge264
|
Im split |
|
which do you guys prefer: archer or warrior? I was an archer back when i first started but im just now getting back into playing it wanted to start from scratch. any help? | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del report
| |
| Members, log in or register to remove these ads. | |
swimmerof 07
|
re: Im split |
|
------------------- Life Is simple. Eat. Sleep. Swim.
| |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del report
| |
edge264
|
re: Im split |
|
i dont know thats why i was hoping someone could give me some insight to the two | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del report
| |
TN_Dastardlyj
|
re: Im split |
|
It's probably better if you try out both and find out what works for you. You'll soon find out whether you prefer distance attacks or melee attacks. | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del report
| |
KewlSyrup
|
re: Im split |
quote TN_DastardlyjYea TN has a point. Warriors rely on a lot of hp and very strong, slow attacks (in the beginning) If you like to massacre monsters and not die alot then a warrior is your character However Archers rely on distant , not very powerful at all attacks. When a monster gets to close, like a sin, you have to hit it back ( cept archers have a blowback % in there bow/xbow that sends the monster flying backwards) If you like steady, distant, ok in power attacks, then a archer is your character ------------------- ![]() Thanks to Lorx for the awsome siggy Thy shall signith Thou Booketh Maximus | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del report
| |
Arias
|
re: Im split |
|
Kewl basically summed it up I guess, except archers do have decent attack damage. They can easily be hitting 1k+ at level 40. -------------------
| |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del report
| |
Yugi vs Kaiba
|
re: Im split |
|
Well, after having played both archer and warrior, my warrior was outdamaging my archer. Archers aren't too good until 80+. Being dexless on my warrior, I was hitting 3k+ at level 40. | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del report
| |
Arias
|
re: Im split |
|
Tyler, it is obvious that a warrior will outdamage a ranged class. But 1k at level 40 is sufficient damage, especially when they are requiring minimal funding as opposed to a (stat)less character. But ya, at level 80 is an archers time to shine. -------------------
| |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del report
| |
KewlSyrup
|
re: Im split |
quote AriasYea ur right my archer got to lvl 67 before i was hacked then banned But still, i recomend u having either a warrior or both, you may get bored of an archer if ur not patient and hard working ------------------- ![]() Thanks to Lorx for the awsome siggy Thy shall signith Thou Booketh Maximus | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del report
| |
AntonHerrera343
|
re: Im split |
|
I don't know. I get bored with any other class except archer, so I'd be biased. ------------------- Credit to Onocron!
| |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del report
| |
Lorx
|
re: Im split |
|
------------------- | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del report
| |
KewlSyrup
|
re: Im split |
|
LOL ------------------- ![]() Thanks to Lorx for the awsome siggy Thy shall signith Thou Booketh Maximus | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del report
| |
Yugi vs Kaiba
|
re: Im split |
quote AriasI just got it to level 58 last night. | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del report
| |
KewlSyrup
|
re: Im split |
|
Grats ------------------- ![]() Thanks to Lorx for the awsome siggy Thy shall signith Thou Booketh Maximus | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del report
| |
| [All dates in (PT) time] | Threads List « Next Newest Next Oldest » |
Powered by neoforums v0.9.4 (equilibrium)
Copyright Neo Era Media, Inc. 1999-2008