|
| |
jespomoOfficer Jespomo
(moderator) Site Contributor's Forum ![]() total posts: 12115 neopoints: 32099 GameGrep pts: 125 since: Mar 2004 |
Better than Red Alert? |
|
I personally think that the current daddy of all war strategy games is Red Alert 2, currently, that is. I've seen a bit of this game and I think it's looking amazing. The detail is abosultely superb especially when zooming right in close to view troops and the inclusion of 360 viewing is also a great help.
Does anyone else think Act Of War is good enough to take the War Strategy Crown from Red Alert 2? ------------------- ![]() Distributing Cockslaps Since 2004 Credit: Oz's Mobile | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
N1
|
re: Better than Red Alert? |
|
Well I just got this game and it keeps telling me that the their is no disk inserted into my pc!
So at the moment im just really pissed off at the game and its a load of crap but im sure it will turn out alright maybe... | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
daman5327
|
re: Better than Red Alert? |
|
dude red alert 2 compared to this game is totally shit. this game can counter both red alert 2, c&c generals, rise of nations and age of empire easy. so i hereby crown act of war stratigy game king!
------------------- <Insert witty/smart phrase here> | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
Shaymen
|
re: Better than Red Alert? |
|
It's pretty damn good, I personally prefer Red Alert to Red Alert 2, and think this is better than 2, but not much can beat the original Red Alert.
------------------- | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
Chief
|
re: Better than Red Alert? |
|
You two are *bleep* tards, why is it that I played Red Alert 2 for years, but this game didnt last two days? Cause its a piece of shit.
| |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
annihilate
|
re: Better than Red Alert? |
|
absolutly is better!!! well C&C zero hour and act of war are on the front should be question who is better zero hour or act of war i played both and even now. well for me both are good act of war have realistic army (paladins) and other good stuff. on the other hand generals zero hour have second CHAS SOURCE THAT ACT OF WAR HAVEN'T AND THAT IS VERY WRONG. what will be next C&C strategy game.
i played red alert 2 for years but generals and act of war beaten have him. life goes on games goes on , opinion goes on | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
annihilate
|
re: Better than Red Alert? |
|
chief
explain why is a piece of shit | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
annihilate
|
re: Better than Red Alert? |
|
absolutley !!!act of war high treason is more than just original act of war direct action
| |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
crazey mad manunwashed heathen
(guest) IP: Logged |
re: Better than Red Alert? |
|
they both suck:P
| |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del report
| |
Herdervriend
|
re: Better than Red Alert? |
|
I don't really know if this game is better then Red Alert, because, Red Alert is awesome, but this game is awesome to.
Only Red Alert 2 looks way to old and oké it crashes/gives less errors/use less space then this game. This, Act of war, it feels like 24, but then in Generals style. It's like a copy of Generals Zero Hour, but then modernized in 24 style. Still, will play both games with pleasure:) | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
| [All dates in (PT) time] | Threads List « Next Newest Next Oldest » |
Powered by neoforums v0.9.8 RC2 (equilibrium)
Copyright Neo Era Media, Inc. 1999-2009