|
| |
| Showing posts by Feynor in this thread (2 posts by Feynor out of 7 total posts in the thread) About this feature: Posts by unique authors made between the messages by Feynor are shown as collapsed so you can have some idea of the members participating in the conversation around them. If the number of posts between Feynor's posts are too high they will be hidden.
Also related to Feynor: Threads Created Messages Page | |
Feynor
|
Soulcalibur II vs. Soulcalibur III |
|
I've played Soulcalibur III for about 3 weeks, and I really started to like the battle system and gameplay potential. I developed an interest in this series, so I wanted to try out Soulcalibur II as well because it was so popular (plus, almost 9/10 people said that it was much, much better than SCIII).
I borrowed my friend's SCII since he does not play it anymore, and after playing through a few characters' stories, I felt that the battles were a LOT easier than SCIII. Really easy. SCIII had much better AI. So in what way really, is SCII better? Is it the multiplayer? Better gameplay (SCIII was more interesting for me)? What else? But I really never bothered to read the stories in the 'Tale of Souls' mode in SCIII. The characters were way too cliche, and uninteresting. Just got the gist of the stories. SCII didn't have any of those annoying things... so it was a bit more fun that way. I liked SCIII more. Put out your opinions here. This message was edited by Feynor on May 26 2009. | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
Feynor
|
re: Soulcalibur II vs. Soulcalibur III |
|
Has anyone read this?
| |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
Mario_1 | |
Stevebeoulve2 | |
superpikmin101 | |
| [All dates in (PT) time] | Threads List « Next Newest Next Oldest » |
Powered by neoforums v0.9.8b (equilibrium)
Copyright Neo Era Media, Inc. 1999-2009