| PAGES: 1 2 next» |
|
| |
8492unwashed heathen
(guest) IP: Logged |
Planes that should be in or improved in AC6 |
|
So,what planes do you think should be in or improved in AC6?I think that the Mig-29,Su-47,F-35,F-16,S-32,Superhornet and Su-25 should be in and improved.
| |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del report
| |
Xenostrike 06
|
re: Planes that should be in or improved in AC6 |
|
for me
planes to get in : -HAL-TEJAS -SAEGEH-80 -SHAFAQ Stealth Fighter -Ching Kuo Taiwan Indigenous Defense Fighter -J-XX -J-17 or FC-1 -Super Etendards Planes to get improved -MIG-29 it's now have been updated to MIG-35 -Su-37 with some new Special weapons..maybe the NOVATOR KS-172 AAM L should fit that's all,want some more ? unfortunately the AC-6 is developed as exclusive game for XBox 360 a console which only remains as a dream for me just like PS3 hence i can't tell anything about its aircraft hope tose Namco guys read my previous thread about "Global Aircraft for Ace combat" but i'm afraid they didn't even bother to do so ------------------- ![]() | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
8492unwashed heathen
(guest) IP: Logged |
re: Planes that should be in or improved in AC6 |
|
I also want a improved F-15E,that thing rocks.The Superhornet rocks too.Better F-35 air to air,better Mig-29,the later versions are better than the flankers.
| |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del report
| |
Xenostrike 06
|
re: Planes that should be in or improved in AC6 |
|
Hmm but i doubted there will be an Improved F-15E...since USAF wants to replace them all with F-22 Raptor maybe we're only "able" too see our old friends Strike Eagle
------------------- ![]() | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
8492unwashed heathen
(guest) IP: Logged |
re: Planes that should be in or improved in AC6 |
|
USAF is'nt replacing Strike Eagles.Besides,the cover plane is a Strike Eagle.
| |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del report
| |
Knight of Gold
|
re: Planes that should be in or improved in AC6 |
|
Yeh, F15C might get replaced someday, still not close, by the F22 but the F22B which would be the strikecraft version of the F22, hence, the replacement for the F15E is still nothing but a concept, I think the Eagles in general are a long way from being replaced.
------------------- *Should everything else fails, read the instructions*
| |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
8492unwashed heathen
(guest) IP: Logged |
re: Planes that should be in or improved in AC6 |
|
Yeah,I love F-15s.
| |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del report
| |
Xenostrike 06
|
re: Planes that should be in or improved in AC6 |
|
Hmm maybe that's right
------------------- ![]() | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
8492unwashed heathen
(guest) IP: Logged |
re: Planes that should be in or improved in AC6 |
|
Your obsessed are'nt you?J-10 is just a cross between Su-27,F-16,and something else,I forgot.
| |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del report
| |
Xenostrike 06
|
re: Planes that should be in or improved in AC6 |
|
But it is a BETTER cross, US Airforce`s B2 Spirit is also a Cross from German`s Horton HO 229..in fact Stealth Technology was German invention,but the Mathematical equation regarding it was invented by Russian Mathematics expert
------------------- ![]() | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
8492unwashed heathen
(guest) IP: Logged |
re: Planes that should be in or improved in AC6 |
|
Military analysts say the J-10 could proably take on a older F/A-18,a Tomcat,and proably a older F-16.It would'nt stand a chance against one of the new Falcons or Hornets,much less a F-22 or Typhoon.The stealth technology was discoverd by the Germans,but we refined it.The J-XX stealth fighter is just a normal plane with stealth materials.
| |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del report
| |
Xenostrike 06
|
re: Planes that should be in or improved in AC6 |
quote 8492but no mock-up combat record..yet so it's still possible for my beloved Vanguard to take on the F/A-18 E and the F-16E the military analyst didn't include its ability to Carry NOVATOR KS-172 AAM L(however i never head any of them in China or maybe they still keep in secrecy) which is far more superior in range than AMRAAM and maybe the British's similar homing weapon,beside British RAF planned their Typhoon as a cannonless aircraft relies only in its Homing Missile ability leave her Vulnerable in Close quarter battle the J-XX is completely "new" aircraft featuring IO Geometry and RAM although it might not be as capable as F-22 but it'll be balanced soon with the Appearance of Sukhoi T-50 uuuh I LOVE DISCUSSION SOOO MUCH ------------------- ![]() | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
Coi Cki
|
re: Planes that should be in or improved in AC6 |
|
PAK-FA Sukhoi T-50
![]() ![]() The T-50 certainly has some familiar features, doesn´t it... ------------------- | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
Xenostrike 06
|
re: Planes that should be in or improved in AC6 |
|
yep sleek aerodynamic feature as F-22 but it still an Artist's concept the real shape might be different, especially when it come with Plasma Stealth..Stealth ability without shaping the Airframe i heard Russian has successfully employ it on board SU-27IB so it became stealth without change in its aerodynamic properties
------------------- ![]() | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
8492unwashed heathen
(guest) IP: Logged |
re: Planes that should be in or improved in AC6 |
|
Just because a plane can carry a good missile,doesn't mean its good.Typhoon does have a cannon,not that it needs one.The J-10
wouldnt be able to get close.J-XX is not a new fighter,just a regular one.China wouldn't stand a chance in a airwar with USA or Russia.Also,China still uses Mig-21s.God. | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del report
| |
| [All dates in (PT) time] | Threads List « Next Newest Next Oldest » |
| PAGES: 1 2 next» |
Powered by neoforums v0.9.8 RC2 (equilibrium)
Copyright Neo Era Media, Inc. 1999-2009