I dislike a challenge, so I tried to make the easiest deck to play I could think of. I have used it practically against everyone in the game now, many several times...
It was made based around the predictable AI, this deck only dies pretty much when an enemy monster gets to 3500+ ATK.

Tell me what ya think about it

Monsters: 20 total
Charcoal Inpachi x2 ; 2100 DEF, *
Giant Soldier of Stone x2 ; 2000 DEF, ***
Soul Tiger x1 ; 2100 DEF, ****
Battle Footballer x3 ; 2100 DEF, ****
Stone Statue of the Aztecs x3 ; 2000 DEF, **** (Effect: Any battle damage opponent takes when attacking this monster is doubled)
Spirit of the Harp x1 ; 2000 DEF, ****
Mystical Elf x2 ; 2000 DEF, ****
Guardian Sphinx x3 ; 2400 DEF, ***** (Effect: Can flip back down - if flip summoned, return all monsters from opponent's field to his/her hand)
Neo Aqua Madoor x3 ; 3000 DEF, *****
*-****:14
*****-******:6
*******-********: 0

Spell: 16 total
Final Flame x3 ; 600 direct damage to opponent's LP
Ookazi x3 ; 800 direct damage to opponent's LP
Tremendous Fire x3 ; 1000 direct damage to opponent's LP, 500 damage to your own LP
Swords of Revealing Light x1 ; Opponent can't attack for 3 turns
Graceful Charity x1 ; Draw 3 cards, discard 2
Chorus of Sanctuary x3 ; Field; Increase the DEF of all monsters by 500
Lightning Vortex x1 ; Discard 1 card, destroy all opponent's face-up monsters
Terraforming x1 ; Add 1 field card to hand, shuffle deck

Traps: 4 total
Magic Cylinder x1 ; Negate attack of 1 of your opponent's monsters, it's ATK is dealt as direct damage to your opponent's LP
Draining Shield x3 ; Negate attack of 1 your opponent's monsters, increase your LP by that monster's ATK

Thanks

wow nice defense deck,,
i rate 80% you can win every dueL,, ^^v

looks good. but id get rid of the tremendous fire and sub in meteor of destruction. same damage to your opponent but you take none. only downside is you cant activate it if your opponent has 3000 or less LP.

Not bad I might have to try that ...plus with a mismatched deck like that terraforming and field spells would be pointless

This message was edited by TwistaG on Nov 05 2009.