| PAGES: «prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 next» |
|
| |
Byzantine
|
re: Final Fantasy VII on PSN |
quote HilaryDuffGtaI mentioned it in another thread at some point in time. ------------------- | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
ShadowGuard
|
re: Final Fantasy VII on PSN |
|
HilaryDuffgta.
The compilation is a group of FFVII games it consists of: FFVII: Crisis Core FFVII FFVII: Advent Children/ Complete FFVII: Dirge of Cerberus All these games/movie go along with the original story of FFVII. Crisis Core was the last one to be released and they stated it was not the last one in the compilation and that there would be a finale. Many people consider the finale to be a FFVII Remake, while others think it is FFVII-2. I personally think there will both @Byzantine, you keep listing all these games, and while they are no doubt great games, they did nothing major for the West. The West remained oblivious to them just like every other RPG. Moonset made a brilliant post and said everything I wanted to. Great games like the ones you listed did not bring RPGs to the West, FFVII was the first RPG to be truly accepted by the West and now the RPG genre is massive worldwide. If anyone else is going to enter this discussion, Moonset's post was brilliant, read it over once or twice. -------------------
| |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
Byzantine
|
re: Final Fantasy VII on PSN |
|
Phantasy Star IV was alone the single best selling RPG of the sega genesis and Super NES era, and the 5th best selling game of the time world wide.
Chrono Trigger was the third best selling game in 1995, behind Donkey Kong Country 2 Secrets of Mana is the number 42 of nintendo's top 200 games ever. And that's just a few examples. Again, FF7 was hardly the first successful rpg. If you're going to make a claim as to why it's great, try making a factual one. Just because FF7 was the first RPG you noticed, doesn't mean it was the first period. Legend of Zelda is another distinctly and hugely popular rpg before FF7. Hugely popular This message was edited by Byzantine on Jun 05 2009. ------------------- | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
Final Blade
|
re: Final Fantasy VII on PSN |
quote ByzantineThanks for missing my post about "I may be biased towards FF7 since It was my FIRST RPG/FF game." And FYI I know all those games, I just stated which you missed AGAIN that I NEVER played them thus can't give a honest opinion . Moonset said everything that needed to be said. quote Chris717I never said it was worth that much for a digital copy. Read my post I clearly stated "THAT SELLS THIS DISC GAMES FOR $60-$100 in stores. Meaning Ebgames, amazon, ebay...etc quote HilaryDuffGtaI do, and so does SE, as I said they put them selves in a position that has to be done. As for compilation, any game/movie that has the title Final Fantasy 7 means it has something to do with FF7 universe thus compilation or a collection if you will. *Final Fantasy 7 Before Crisis(Phone game) *Final Fantasy 7 Crisis Core(PSP) *Final Fantasy 7 (PS1, PC, PSN) *Final Fantasy 7 Advent Children(movie sequel to Final Fantasy 7 game) *Final Fantasy 7 Advent Children Complete(extended edition of the movie and on blu-ray) *Final Fantasy 7 Dirge of Cerberus(sequel game(PS2) to Final Fantasy 7 and Advent Children), ^ these are all out now(ACC should be coming out in the states and world soon), most likely the compilation will end with a FF7 remake and/or with FF7 DoC2. As much as I hate a sequel for it, it seems most likely it'll happen. Although I prefer it if the sequel to DoC was an animated movie. ------------------- Welcome to Crisis Core forum Welcome to Bad Company 2 God of War 3 official forum community | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
Byzantine
|
re: Final Fantasy VII on PSN |
quote Final BladeReally, i'm just trying to find valid reasons as to why everyone thinks this game is so amazing, because really, it did nothing unique or unprecedented. You're making these claims that aren't even remotely true about it being the first major RPG, the first RPG to gain western attention, the first RPG with character development at it's level, and all these other BS claims that are wholly untrue. It doesn't matter that you didn't play any of the games i mentioned (i don't know how you could have missed them in your life, according to your profile, you're older than i am, and i played them all), the fact remains that they were epics, they were game changers, and they were really all these things you're claiming FF7 to be. I've played the game, i thought it was good, but i don't think it was anything as nearly as amazing as you make it out to be. What is so amazing about this game? i really want to know, i mean It's gameplay was basically a rehash of all the previous Final Fantasy games and it's plot was no more deep or interesting than several previous RPG's, nor did it bring "rpg games" to attention in the west like so many of you claim. How can you go on declaring it's this epic game changer when in fact it did nothing to change RPG gaming whatsoever? I'm not saying it's a bad game, or that it can't be your favorite, or any of those other things. I'm merely trying to illustrate that it's really not as objectively game altering and phenomenal as so many fanboys make it out to be, in any real significant way. ------------------- | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
Final Blade
|
re: Final Fantasy VII on PSN |
|
Yea, I never mentioned the west or called it a MAJOR RPG game. I never said it was the FIRST game to have a DEEP store or DEEP character development. Now you're just reading what you want to read. I said IT HAD character development and story that was captivating.
That's all, those points didn't mean IT WAS THE FIRST, rather it had and why it was critically acclaimed as it was. If you can't get what I mean, then there's no point for me to continue this with you Byz. Meta Score 92(critically Acclaimed) ------------------- Welcome to Crisis Core forum Welcome to Bad Company 2 God of War 3 official forum community | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
Moonset
|
re: Final Fantasy VII on PSN |
|
It did bring RPGs to the mainstream in the west. Quite frankly, JRPGs were a niche market in the west until after FFVII was released.
Honestly, the fact of the matter is that it was really the complete package. You keep saying "well games have had deep story lines before" (no shit, by the way) and "it just rehashed previous games' battle systems" (which it didn't other than using the ATB system), but it brought many great elements together and added the 3D plane to RPGs which was quite simply a massive overhaul. Face it Byz, you're just hating for the hell of it. You haven't substantiated anything you've said so far and you just keep saying "well it didn't do this first" or "well other games have done that too". No shit they did. The difference is that FFVII managed to be the complete package and brought about gameplay and story elements that made it much more powerful and gripping at the time. ------------------- ![]() Who's that? The Mastermind. | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
Byzantine
|
re: Final Fantasy VII on PSN |
quote MoonsetI'm not hating, i've said countless times that i like the game just fine and have played several other Final Fantasy games, you're all just making claims that this game is the best ever for reasons that are less than honest. you're simply attacking me as a hater and refuting my very supported and substantiated argument because i'm calling out your beloved game. Phantasy Star 4 was the 5th best selling console game of the Super NES/ Sega Genesis era. I've substantiated everything, Hell, Phantasy Star sold 6 million copies. In comparison, Donkey Kong Country sold only 8 million (an unprecedented number of sells for the era). 6 million, when the average game sold maybe a million if it was lucky, is hardly a niche crowd. That's only one of the RPG's i've mentioned. 6 million is hardly a niche crowd, so please, be at least a little honest. The reality is, Final Fantasy Seven is just another good RPG, it's not a game changer, it's not the first to do anything, it's not even distinctly unique. It was just good, and for many, was the first RPG they experienced (which doesn't mean first ever). Also, Final Blade. You didn't claim those things, but your supporters did. in case you didn't notice, i'm the only one fighting my side of the battle, because i'm the only one both informed and interested enough to tell the truth as it really is. EDIT: We must also remember that Phantasy Star hampered it's own success, and was selling for $70 new, when it's competitor games were selling for half that much. This message was edited by Byzantine on Jun 06 2009. ------------------- | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
Final Blade
|
re: Final Fantasy VII on PSN |
|
Byz, Wiki isn't definitive, but if you want to use that, then let me quote this:
quote FF76 million huh? Sounds more like 10 million fans + Again, while wiki isn't definitive since people edit it all the time, I just thought I throw this in here as well. ------------------- Welcome to Crisis Core forum Welcome to Bad Company 2 God of War 3 official forum community | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
Byzantine
|
re: Final Fantasy VII on PSN |
|
Again, 6 million when it was selling for twice the amount of competitors and was in an era when a game sold a couple hundred thousand copies at most is absolutely incredible.
Phantasy Star 4 came out in 1995 in the middle of the Super Nintendo era, and it was on the Sega Genesis which only sold 24 million consoles total. The Sony PlayStation sold 102.5 million consoles 6 million of 24 million is a whole lot bigger piece of the pie than 10 million of 102 million. 25%>9.8% Comparatively, for it's generation, Phantasy Star was a far more successful game, and did all the things you claim FF7 did, long before. And it's only one of a few critically acclaimed RPG's that gained worldwide (even American) recognition. ------------------- | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
SephClone89
|
re: Final Fantasy VII on PSN |
|
Okay lets get things straight,
FF7 is popular because of its story and characters. Such a story was considered brilliant back then, but these days it feels like a standard RPG. The characters on the other hand were interpreted really good with each character having a connection with one another. All the other games you stated are brilliant in their own way. You cant compare them with FF7 because there not the same genre as FF7.(except Phantasy Star was similar to FF) Lets just agree FF7 is good. ------------------- Come and have fun in the Survival Horror Social forum. You wont regret it. | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
Chris717
|
re: Final Fantasy VII on PSN |
quote Final BladeFor someone who has never played it before, and is only going off opinions, the price of the original doesn't affect whether i buy it or not. I am only interested in this copy. ------------------- | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
ShadowGuard
|
re: Final Fantasy VII on PSN |
quote ByzantineDont put percentages in this, now you are just making excuses... People did not want the SEGA Genesis bad enough to play your games. 10 million people were going to get FFVII one way or the other final fantasy - 3.09 million in America I cannot find any of your phantasy star american sales, but I doubt they are that even with Japanese sales. And stop bringing up non RPG games, we are talking about RPGs are getting accepted in the West. If it is not in the RPG genre (Donkey Kong Country) then do not bring it up... I must agree with moonset, you are just being a hater of FFVII like numerous other people for no reason... The facts are on our side Byz, nothing you have stated has been convincing, especially when you bring non-RPG games to the discussion to try and make a point, in which you still failed in... -------------------
| |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
Final Blade
|
re: Final Fantasy VII on PSN |
|
Also, don't bring Wikipedia as a solid fact link to support your point. Sure it's ok for minor things, but Wikipedia get's edited so many times throughout the day, that nothing on that site can be taken 100% accuracy. I only used the FF7 Wiki link cause you used it before. I'll try to find more links maybe from VGchartz about FF7 later.
------------------- Welcome to Crisis Core forum Welcome to Bad Company 2 God of War 3 official forum community | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
Extric
|
re: Final Fantasy VII on PSN |
|
Wow, why has no one stepped up to help Byz? Everything he's said is right. FFVII is terribly overrated and, as he's pointed out several times, did nothing that wasn't already being done or had already been done. Phantasy Star that was released in 1988 on the Sega Master System was already doing the stuff that FFVII did besides 3D models (which really isn't a fair argument since the technology wasn't really there during those times).
While FFVII is a good game, it's not as groundbreaking as people make it out to be. Hell, I don't even think it's one of the better FF games either. I much prefer IV, IX, and X. | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
| [All dates in (PT) time] | Threads List « Next Newest Next Oldest » |
| PAGES: «prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 next» |
Powered by neoforums v0.9.8b (equilibrium)
Copyright Neo Era Media, Inc. 1999-2009