venom's posts in "Is Vic Vance really dead?"

Forum Options:	my.neoforum register members prefs search faq

\| more Options: Print subscribe remove NeoPM Topic: Is Vic Vance really dead?
Threads List « Next Newest Next Oldest »
Showing posts by venom in this thread (9 posts by venom out of 79 total posts in the thread) About this feature: Posts by unique authors made between the messages by venom are shown as collapsed so you can have some idea of the members participating in the conversation around them. If the number of posts between venom's posts are too high they will be hidden. Also related to venom: Threads Created Messages Page
venom It's better to burn out than fade away Legendary Seeker since: Aug 2003	Mar 13, 07 at 7:18pm Is Vic Vance really dead?
	I heard in the opening scene of Vice City, Vic Vance dies in the police raid as drugs are being dealt. I was interested and so I dusted off Vice City and stuck it in the PS2, watched the opening scene, but didn't see Vic. Anywhere. I am assuming that Vic was the guy who had the briefcase and told Tommy that he had a deal, and if that was Vic, then; A. It looked NOTHING like him B. Even if it was him, why did he look so old? There were only 2 years between Vice City and Vice City stories, and finally; C. Why was his voice different in the two versions of the game? I am curious now, can someone clear this up? Sadly I can't find a picture of GTA Vice City 1's version of Vic. This message was edited by Zero Tolerance on Mar 14 2007. ------------------- Gone
	quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
Bulcky	go to post posts in thread
trendyskaman	go to post posts in thread
venom It's better to burn out than fade away Legendary Seeker since: Aug 2003	Mar 13, 07 at 8:28pm re: Is Vic Vance really dead?
	Interesting how they look so different. In Vice City (the original) Vic has hair and a 'tash and looks older but in VCS he is bald and fresh faced, even though there is so little time period before the two character models. ------------------- Gone
	quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
ulitmate taz	go to post posts in thread
venom It's better to burn out than fade away Legendary Seeker since: Aug 2003	Mar 13, 07 at 8:41pm re: Is Vic Vance really dead?
	I doubt that is Vic Vance in the picture, I mean did Lance ever mention Vics name in the story missions of VC1? ------------------- Gone
	quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
Chimaira	go to post posts in thread
venom It's better to burn out than fade away Legendary Seeker since: Aug 2003	Mar 13, 07 at 8:43pm re: Is Vic Vance really dead?
	Okay, but what about the completely different accent when he speaks? ------------------- Gone
	quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
Chimaira	go to post posts in thread
venom It's better to burn out than fade away Legendary Seeker since: Aug 2003	Mar 13, 07 at 8:53pm re: Is Vic Vance really dead?
	Meh I just find GTA history fascinating and I like it when all the pieces of the puzzle have been put together. ------------------- Gone
	quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
BigBhaarlokzMon	go to post posts in thread
Bulcky	go to post posts in thread
... 3 additional posts not shown due to thread length.
Coi Cki	go to post posts in thread
ulitmate taz	go to post posts in thread
venom It's better to burn out than fade away Legendary Seeker since: Aug 2003	Mar 14, 07 at 7:07pm re: Is Vic Vance really dead?
	quote ChiroVette Well I am still holding out hope that we will see Vic again in a future GTA installment and that Lance had another brother that was killed. "He killed my brother!" does NOT have to mean that the guy they killed was his only brother. Me too, Chiro. Vic is a cool character, (my second favourite, second to Tommy V of course) and I hope he didn't die. He looks totally different in Vice City 1986 so i think that wasn't him at all. ------------------- Gone
	quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
Tom	go to post posts in thread
Bulcky	go to post posts in thread
venom It's better to burn out than fade away Legendary Seeker since: Aug 2003	Mar 14, 07 at 9:16pm re: Is Vic Vance really dead?
	I doubt they (Rockstar) will give us any more information, just like they didn't tell us anything about what happened to Tommy Vercetti between 1986 and the 1990's - why did Wayne and Jeffro abandon the boat yard in Vice City and leave for San Andreas? And why did Ken Rosenberg leave Vice City for San Andreas and abandoned Tommy? (He even called CJ Tommy once, to which CJ says, "Who the hell is Tommy?" But that's another story. Fact is Rockstar seem to have a habit of keeping information such as this from us. ------------------- Gone
	quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
Bulcky	go to post posts in thread
venom It's better to burn out than fade away Legendary Seeker since: Aug 2003	Mar 14, 07 at 9:30pm re: Is Vic Vance really dead?
	Well not unless they intend on bringing back all 5 protagonists for one game. ------------------- Gone
	quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
Bulcky	go to post posts in thread
Lord_Coal	go to post posts in thread
... 6 additional posts not shown due to thread length.
ulitmate taz	go to post posts in thread
trendyskaman	go to post posts in thread
venom It's better to burn out than fade away Legendary Seeker since: Aug 2003	Apr 11, 07 at 9:35pm re: Is Vic Vance really dead?
	quote trendyskaman Isn't the other Vance brother pretty sickly, though? Clearly the Vance brother killed in the opening sequence of Vice City is a healthy, strong individual and wouldn't have spent a lot of time sick in bed. Just something I was pondering... All I heard is that he had "asthma" (which we all know isn't that life threatening, hell I have had it since I was a kid), and even so, Vice City is set two years later, so he might have recovered from whatever else he was suffering from. Lets have a look at the facts shall we? The "Vic Vance" of Vice City looks a lot (and sounds a lot different) to the Vic Vance of Vice City stories. Vic said that he was done with drugs, so why would he go back to drugs two years later? There was no sign at the end of VCS that he intended on going back to his old ways. It is a well known fact that there is a third Vance brother, Vic and Lances brother, Pete, who is suffering from asthma. Would it be entirely plausible to suggest that it was actually he who was killed at the start of Vice City? I mean just read my theory - Vic says he is done with drugs, so Lance turns to his other brother for help, Pete. Togeter they continue the drug business and leave Vic out of it, (which is why he isn't seen in Vice City) and Pete ends up being caught up in a botched drug deal and is killed. Not Vic, who said he is done with drugs. This would explain why the two models look and sound so different between 1984 and 1986. That is one theory, although Chiro's theory is also equally plausible - quote Chiro Vette My opinion is that Rockstar intended it to be that Vic was killed at the start of Vice City, but perhaps they decided, last minute, in creating the VCS storyline, that they would find a way to make it so that he didn't really die, and, instead, he and Lance had another brother who was killed. ------------------- Gone
	quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
HilaryDuffGta	go to post posts in thread
Coi Cki	go to post posts in thread
Pablo2k9	go to post posts in thread
ReanimationTheory92	go to post posts in thread
KRUTON 9000	go to post posts in thread
Melo Man	go to post posts in thread
... 15 additional posts truncated due to thread length.
[All dates in (PT) time]	Threads List « Next Newest Next Oldest »

Grand Theft Auto: Vice City Stories Forum PS2 PSP