| PAGES: «prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 next» |
|
| |
Chris Player
|
re: Death Star V.S. Star Forge. |
quote shinobi_razorare you sure it would take the death star so long to charge up, they wouldnt have time to get to the moon | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
SIS_Wolfhound
|
re: Death Star V.S. Star Forge. |
quote MishtramYes, Because the death star is unprotected at ALL times ------------------- Look at my work.
| |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
Shinobi_razor
|
re: Death Star V.S. Star Forge. |
|
it seems like from the movie(s) that it takes like almost 5 minutes to charge it up, i mean, it is a FRIKKIN huge laser after all. i mean it is meant to destroy planets.
and the only reason a Borg Cube's shields could withstand a blast from it is because their shields are hundreds of times stronger than even the Death Star's shields are. thats easy to tell because it takes 8 to 10 Federation Starfleet ships all firing their phasers and Photon torpedos (both of which are tons more powerful than laser turrets) for almost 10 minutes to bring down the shields and destroy a Borg Cube. those ships are nearly indestructable. also, i really doubt the Star Forge has a super weapon equivalent to the DS's laser because if it did, Malak probably would have used it against the Republic's capital ships in the final battle. or at least someone would have mentioned it in one of the cut-scenes. ------------------- ![]() | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
Ridenunwashed heathen
(guest) IP: Logged |
re: Death Star V.S. Star Forge. |
|
The Star Forge has a disrupter field witch would cause the Death Star crash into Rakata Prime (the UNKNOWN PLANET) before it got into range to fire. Also the ships crated by the Star Forge can pass through the field and destroy the Death Star the traditional way.
------------------------------------------ I am the Dark Lord of the Sith | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del report
| |
TurMoiL911Duty • Honor • Country
(moderator) Action [PS3] Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 ![]() total posts: 24995 GameGrep pts: 1703 since: Apr 2004 |
re: Death Star V.S. Star Forge. |
|
[quote][originator=Riden]The Star Forge has a disrupter field witch would cause the Death Star crash into Rakata Prime (the UNKNOWN PLANET) before it got into range to fire. Also the ships crated by the Star Forge can pass through the field and destroy the Death Star the traditional way.[/q]
Doubt it. Remember in A New Hope ? The Death Star was pretty damn far away from Alderran was it blew that planet to hell. ------------------- Tomorrow there will be no shortage of volunteers. No shortage of patriots. Tango Uniform Romeo Mike Oscar India Lima 9iner 1ne 1ne I hope you understand.
| |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
Shinobi_razor
|
re: Death Star V.S. Star Forge. |
quote Ridenummm. no. you totally have no clue what youre talking about... the disrupter field thing ONLY affects ships, and only mid sized ships, not really large ones. the Death Star is basically an artificial satellite (moon), actually, thats EXACTLY what it is, and therefore it orbits a planet, or another moon in this case (Endor) which is larger than it. therefore the disrupter field has no effect on it. and also, no ships, i dont care where theyre made, can pass right through energy shields and "destroy the Death Star the traditional way." dont you ever watch sci-fi shows? ------------------- ![]() | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
SIS_Wolfhound
|
re: Death Star V.S. Star Forge. |
|
How can anyone compare stuff from star wars to stuff from Star Trek?
------------------- Look at my work.
| |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
ridenunwashed heathen
(guest) IP: Logged |
re: Death Star V.S. Star Forge. |
|
if the death star was orbiting endor for its energy shield it would be completely out of range to attack the star forge. star forge builds huge fleets of ships as in thousands, go to endor and do what they did to taris and proceed on killing the death star.
| |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del report
| |
Chris Player
|
re: Death Star V.S. Star Forge. |
quote SIS_Wolfhoundi know, isnt startrek alot more unadvanced ( i dont really watch it, and shinobi_razor, give him a break, at least riden is trying | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
Shinobi_razor
|
re: Death Star V.S. Star Forge. |
quote ridenwell technically yes you would be right. but in this scenario, they are both in range of each other. maybe the Star Forge somehow moves to Endor's star to suck power or something. they never even existed at the same time anyway, so by that logic this whole entire thread doesnt make sence. but its just for fun, pretending like they are in the same time, and near each other. and Star Trek mostly is much more advanced than Wars in all areas of ship design, weapons, shields etc. it does take place in the future, while Wars takes place "a long time ago." that doesnt mean the Imperials couldnt survive against the Borg though. while their personal shields can protect against all energy weapons, they are hopeless against melee weapons, such as swords and blades. this is why, for instance, i hold to believe that a large group of Klingon warriors all with Bat'leths (swords) could defeat a group of Borg roughly the same size. the Borg's sheilds cant do anything against Bat'leths. so if the Imperials happened to have some sort of swords (like vibroblades) laying around (which is not likely), they would have a much better chance against the Borg onslaught. i think the Emperor's personal guards use melee weapons so perhaps they could do some damage, however if i remember there are only 5 or 6 of them, so that doesnt help much. ------------------- ![]() | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
Ridenunwashed heathen
(guest) IP: Logged |
re: Death Star V.S. Star Forge. |
|
Actually star trek uses phasers and lasers witch are lower quality weapons. For instants in star wars Lasers where obsolete in 30,000 BBY (Before the Battle of Yavin) When the Rakata invented Blasters witch where more effective than lasers.
------------------------------------------ I Am The Dark Lord Of The Sith | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del report
| |
darth evilous
|
re: Death Star V.S. Star Forge. |
|
what about the sun crusher? that would beat both of them.
| |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
Shinobi_razor
|
re: Death Star V.S. Star Forge. |
|
Phasers > Blasters
Photon torpedos >>>>> Blasters ------------------- ![]() | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
Acheron
|
re: Death Star V.S. Star Forge. |
|
If it were the 1st Death Star the Star Forge could create a fleet of ships to attack the Death Star and dispatch it when one of the many ships got close enough to that exhaust vent. Star Forge wins.
The second Death Star could probably only be destroyed by taking out it's shield generator. If this Death Star was completed it would win, if not it still has a good chance in my opinion. ------------------- ![]() "Quoth the Server, 404..." ~ Unknown_User | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
Shinobi_razor
|
re: Death Star V.S. Star Forge. |
|
yeah probably so. but it seems most ppl in the thread are thinking about the 2nd DS so i went with that one for my scenario. the 1st DS lacked a shield and so it would not have nearly as much a chance as the 2nd one, but it would still not be easy to destroy, but the SF fleet just may be able to overtake it.
------------------- ![]() | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
| [All dates in (PT) time] | Threads List « Next Newest Next Oldest » |
| PAGES: «prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 next» |
Powered by neoforums v0.9.7g (equilibrium)
Copyright Neo Era Media, Inc. 1999-2009