This thread is closed to replies.
| PAGES: «prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 next» |
|
| |
oroksh32
|
re: Signature of the Week v4.0 |
|
Why did I know someone was going to use red splatters or a gun... o_O?
| |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
splatterplattermoderator
Digital Portfolios Graphics Battles Graphics Requests Graphics and Animation Tips and Tutorials ![]() since: Jan 2005 |
re: Signature of the Week v4.0 |
|
Why did I know you would post something completely pointless that contributes nothing to this thread?
| |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
oroksh32
|
re: Signature of the Week v4.0 |
|
Calm down man, don't get your knickers in a knot. I was just pointing out that it's a commonly used technique and it looks similar to 1831 mother*bleep*er=redeemer piece. The gun anyways.
| |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
ctrl
|
re: Signature of the Week v4.0 |
|
Bee linked me here.
![]() | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
tears of insanity
|
re: Signature of the Week v4.0 |
quote oroksh32No one can make anything without you finding something similar. | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
Shattered Silence
|
re: Signature of the Week v4.0 |
quote oroksh32I believe that splatter had made a sig with a gun and transparency prior to 1831's Mother*bleep*er=redeemer piece. | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
oroksh32
|
re: Signature of the Week v4.0 |
quote Tears of InsanityThanks, but I don't need your attitude. It's OBVIOUS that you stole Dioscuri's idea for the first entry you submitted in the Pokemon Mystery Dungeon Header and Footer Contest, so don't go whining to me that someone 'found out'. | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
saskay
|
re: Signature of the Week v4.0 |
quote Synikthanks but i recon jizzi will win then naudia(cant spell that name) then me if i actually get into the top 3 | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
Garkaz
|
re: Signature of the Week v4.0 |
|
I also would like to support Saskays entry in this weeks Signature of the Week contest.
| |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
crick
|
re: Signature of the Week v4.0 |
|
OH WOWO. so i was looking through the thread and i was like "hmmm many mediocre entries..." AND THEN I SAW SASKAY'S ENTRY! There are so many good aspects to this piece I don't know how anyone could deny it's beauty.
| |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
Shattered Silence
|
re: Signature of the Week v4.0 |
|
I agree with carkaz and Grick. Everyone has been so predictable in applying their transparency, but Saskay really grasped the theme with both hands. Judges, you know what to do.
| |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
Tengu
|
re: Signature of the Week v4.0 |
|
I agree with SS, Garkaz and Crick. His entry is impeccable in every manner.
| |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
Iscariot
|
re: Signature of the Week v4.0 |
|
I was considering making an entry this round, but, well, now...
| |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
Ryancola
|
re: Signature of the Week v4.0 |
|
Shut up guys.
Saskay your entry is absolutely awful. =| | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
Garkaz
|
re: Signature of the Week v4.0 |
|
Ryan that was suprisingly mean of you
| |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
| [All dates in (PT) time] | Threads List « Next Newest Next Oldest » |
| PAGES: «prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 next» |
Powered by neoforums v0.9.8b (equilibrium)
Copyright Neo Era Media, Inc. 1999-2009