This thread is closed to replies.
|
| |
Donnelly
|
Inconsistencies with moderators. |
|
I was recently banned for my comments in an article about a football/RPG game.
Basically: I insulted people who called football soccer. I received a ban. Akira_EX insulted people who call football football. Nothing. I insult tekmosis' intelligence. I get banned. tekmosis insults my intellegence. Nothing. Why is there such inconsistency with the moderators? Note: Also, I would like to say I tried to resolve this with the moderator who banned me, Akira_EX but I was ignored 4 times. And also, I know this will get reported despite the fact there's nothing wrong with it. I'll copy/paste it into a notepad file in case I have to repost it. ------------------- i don't read posts with queer fonts
| |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
Linkin Park Fan
|
re: Inconsistencies with moderators. |
|
Ever tried not insulting people
------------------- | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
Capn Droid
|
re: Inconsistencies with moderators. |
------------------- ![]() | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
Twisted
|
re: Inconsistencies with moderators. |
quoteThat seemed as if he was joking, and you were just plain flaming people who call the sport soccer. quoteWhat do you think is going to bloody happen when you insult the admin on the site. He told you to stop trolling, and you responded with something not relevant and called him an idiot. Again, call the people with power idiots and keep on trolling, it isn't surprising you got a ban. ------------------- ![]() | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
Moonrise
|
re: Inconsistencies with moderators. |
|
Well to an end if you're going to choose to ban a member for flaming you then the smarter decision is to stick to the high road and not send an insult back. Kinda comes off as childish or hyper-defensive if you're going to slap them back with an insult of your own and lay the banhammer down.
------------------- | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
Donnelly
|
re: Inconsistencies with moderators. |
quote Linkin Park FanI am nice. Just not always to people who insult me, say something stupid or are just plain annoying. But like Capn Droid said, that couldn't be less related to the point I'm trying to make. Droid, I've been banned from forums for retaliating to someone flaming me. It can't be one rule for us, another rule for the mods. Twisted, how come when it's Akira it's just a light hearted joke but when it's me I'm flaming? And like I said, I've been banned for retaliating to someone. Mods shouldn't be above this power. Moonrise, it's also very hypocritical. All I'm asking for is a little consistency. If I get banned, someone who does the same thing should receive the same punishment. edit: Also Andrew, I wasn't trolling. Insulting someone is not trolling. An example of trolling would be to go into a Metal Gear Online game and say "Am I the only one who thinks Splinter Cell is much, MUCH better?" ------------------- i don't read posts with queer fonts
| |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
Enhance
|
re: Inconsistencies with moderators. |
|
The biggest difference is that you like to throw around the word idiot which makes a comment go from an argumentative opinion to an insult. Which is why you were banned and not Akira_EX.
Also, I don't see where tekmosis banned you. What you said to him further reinforced the ban Akira_EX placed against you but tecmo didn't have involvement in the ban. Finally, I suggest looking up the word hackneyed as I wouldn't classify it as racism and Akira does not mean it to come off that way either. | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
Donnelly
|
re: Inconsistencies with moderators. |
quote EnhanceSurely you're not saying you are allowed to insult people as long as you insult them in certain ways? quote EnhanceI didn't say he was. I said it was my post aimed at him that got me banned. quote EnhancePersonally I don't like being told my views are stale or platitudinous. I don't particularly like when everyone from the same continent as me has these same boring views. Honestly, how saying someone is not clever anything to release something any different from calling someone an idiot? ------------------- i don't read posts with queer fonts
| |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
DeathsytheAll My Base Are Belong to Avalith.
(moderator) Wiki Staff Applications wiki staff advancewars digimon fable guitarhero neowiki ![]() total posts: 6993 neopoints: 1182 GameGrep pts: 7869 since: Jul 2002 |
re: Inconsistencies with moderators. |
quote DonnellyAnd I'm sure tekmo doesn't like having his intelligence questioned, but that isn't even in the same ballpark as telling someone's opinions are basically boring and stale. Donnelly, just accept that you were out of line and move on. The quicker you do that, the quicker the situation resolves itself and we can all move on without having to read your rant's about corrupt power-tripping moderators in all the feedback forums. Oh, and don't think your condescending demeanor and lexicon haven't gone unnoticed. That alone would qualify as trolling in my book- as it is a very broad subject and not limited to just posting that splinter cell is better in a MGS forum as you outlined above. ------------------- Thanks Diamondflame for the Christmas Avatar.
| |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
Moonrise
|
re: Inconsistencies with moderators. |
|
You know, while Donnelly may not be saying things the right way, I am simply appalled to see no acknowledgment of poor judgment or actions on the side of the moderators.
------------------- | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
Donnelly
|
re: Inconsistencies with moderators. |
quote DeathsytheI may well have deserved a ban. But not for trolling. Flaming if anything. However that's not the point I'm trying to make, the point I'm trying to make is that there seems to be one rule for some, one rule for others. I won't just sit back and accept something I feel is unfair, I'll question it. And chances are I'll continue to question this after my ban is over... unless, of course, I get a decent answer. One that isn't "you started it" or "You calling him stupid is different to him calling you stupid". quoteHang on, my posts were condescending but tekmosis saying I wasn't clever enough to grasp his point isn't condescending? ------------------- i don't read posts with queer fonts
| |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
tekmosis
|
re: Inconsistencies with moderators. |
|
Weather he banned you because you were repetitively flaming users or because I had warned you and you chose to yet again throw out insults. Either way both are justifications for a short term ban.
We do not reprimand approvers/moderators in a public spotlight. We handle things behind doors and on a 1 to 1 basis. This is the same concept practiced with members themselves. I believe Akira even PM'ed you about it. Members do not publicly need to know who was banned, why and when. This is also why your ban was not a public event, until you brought the topic up yourself. While my response wasn't the best choice of words to use, the point should be taken as an expression of my disappointment that you could not grasp the example I was trying to make and that the behavior you were expressing was not acceptable. If you feel that a moderator/approver is ignoring you, you need to either PM another moderator and if that route fails you can go to a super moderator. Our GameGrep moderator team consists of: Krunal Avalith Akira_Ex Xenctuary Supers are as following: http://www.neoseeker.com/forums/15/t1124747-supermoderator-activity/ ------------------- afk from Dec 23rd - Jan 4th | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
Donnelly
|
re: Inconsistencies with moderators. |
|
No, Akira never PM'd me about it. I had no idea who it was that banned me or what for until I PM'd some of the big wigs from GG. I then PM'd Akira (see PM below) and after he wasn't able to answer my questions he started to ignore me.
After Akira said there was nothing further to discuss, despite the fact he'd dodged 3 of my questions from my previous PM, I responded with: quoteThat was when he started to ignore me. Another thing, it seems odd that I would receive a PM from one of Akira's friends saying: "Its actually reallly funny when you argue with Akira lol." How would he know I was having a private argument with Akira if I didn't tell him and bans were meant to be handled "behind doors and on a 1 to 1 basis"? Also you say that I should take your comment as a sign of your disappointment, well I'm not willing to accept that. If me calling you an idiot is flaming, so is you saying I'm not smart enough to realise something. ------------------- i don't read posts with queer fonts
| |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
tekmosis
|
re: Inconsistencies with moderators. |
|
I think you're being a bit quick on the finger pointing trigger. Looking at the comment structure on the GG article it can be seen as an argument between you and Akira_Ex. From the sentence you posted it mentions absolutely nothing about "ban" or "pm".
I'm sorry you're not willing to accept that. If you've taken anything I've said the wrong way I apologize. However, I've already explained the situation to you, there's nothing more I can detail that has not already been brought up. What I will do is speak to Akira_Ex on some topics brought up by this incident. This is no longer a topic in need of further discussion. ------------------- afk from Dec 23rd - Jan 4th | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
| [All dates in (PT) time] | Threads List « Next Newest Next Oldest » |
Powered by neoforums v0.9.8b (equilibrium)
Copyright Neo Era Media, Inc. 1999-2009