| PAGES: «prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 next» |
|
| |
Shinobi_razor
|
re: General Game Discussion 1 |
|
as sad as that is, thats not really important here in the SC2 forum. so back on topic...
------------------- ![]() | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
000DESTRUCT0
|
re: General Game Discussion 1 |
quote Supa Saiyan GogettaThat's why I even bothered to do it. If it doesn't matter to you then move on as if you never read it. So back onto whatever anybody was going to say in the first place... | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
beast009
|
re: General Game Discussion 1 |
|
general discussion means general discussion about THE GAME not anything in general
| |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
AznLiquid
|
re: General Game Discussion 1 |
quoteA user posted a theory about Supply Depots on the teamliquid forums. Sounds interesting. Maybe the removal of the depot will force Terran to play slightly more offensive. ------------------- | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
Diversion
|
re: General Game Discussion 1 |
|
I was never too fond of supply depots, especially on smaller maps because they took up too much space. I don't know how they would make terran supply a researchable upgrade but it will be interesting to see how they change things.
------------------- | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
AznLiquid
|
re: General Discussion 1 |
|
He was thinking that all the Command Centers will have an optional upgrade kind of thing. Where you can research a bigger supply capacity from it. A good theory, but if a CC happens to get destroyed the Terran army will take a huge hit.
------------------- | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
Shinobi_razor
|
re: General Game Discussion 1 |
|
yeah thats one thing. 1 SD gets destroyed its no biggie, but if the CC that has a lot of supply upgrades on it is gone then your in deep shit.
why dont they instead combine the SD with another of Terran's buildings, like one of the upgrade facilities. on the note of combining buildings, what if they combined Turrets with Bunkers so that infantry could enter Turrets, providing the Turret with ground attack and help with air attack. ------------------- ![]() | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
Casey
|
re: General Game Discussion 1 |
|
And if it was a researchable upgrade, that would also mean no SCV's when getting supplies. And that will throw allot of people off.
------------------- ![]() http://askthefurryone.com/main/ For all your FPS gaming needs, visit ATFO and sign up TODAY! | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
AznLiquid
|
re: General Game Discussion 1 |
quote casey963For all we know, you may be able to upgrade and build at the same time. This game isn't going to play exactly like SC1. ------------------- | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
Diversion
|
re: General Discussion 1 |
|
Maybe they were just testing something out and they didn't add the supply depots yet, or it was a secondary base in which they hadn't built any supply depots?
------------------- | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
Casey
|
re: General Game Discussion 1 |
quote AznLiquidMaybe. But I hope they keep supply depots, like you and Shinobi said, that thing gets destroyed, you're pretty much screwed. ------------------- ![]() http://askthefurryone.com/main/ For all your FPS gaming needs, visit ATFO and sign up TODAY! | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
000DESTRUCT0
|
re: General Discussion 1 |
quote beast456I'll do that now that it's stated with the thread's title on the forum page, but with such ambiguity in the first post, what the hell was I supposed to think? quote Myself quoting Super Saiyan GogettaMish Edit: Quiet down, please. I may have forgotten my warning but common sense should have stopped anyone from lashing out. =/ This message was edited by Mishtram(moderator) on Jul 07 2007. | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
Casey
|
re: General Game Discussion 1 |
|
Not to be rude, but who are you? Just a guy wandering the forums posting in General discussion area's? Meh w/e.
I cant wait to see a Zerg base, and how it'lives', It would be cool seeing all there buildings moving and breathing. Something more realistic then in BW, and hopefuly less bleeding, seriously, whats up with that? ------------------- ![]() http://askthefurryone.com/main/ For all your FPS gaming needs, visit ATFO and sign up TODAY! | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
Supa Saiyan Gogetta
|
re: General Game Discussion 1 |
|
Okay, so there's a notice under the thread's link now, also I've edited my post. With the fuss going on in the thread for awhile, let this be at peace and continue with the discussion of Starcraft 2.
The bleeding... well, the buildings are made of flesh, so it has to bleed when taken down, makes it seem more realistic, like how you would like to see how Zergs lives, moving, breathing buildings. ------------------- | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
Casey
|
re: General Discussion 1 |
|
Well, they have buildings that just bleed continualy, like the extractor I belive, it bleeds. Even if its not attacked. Why does it bleed?
I would also like to see how evolution, and other buildings go. It would be cool to see something new in that catagory. ------------------- ![]() http://askthefurryone.com/main/ For all your FPS gaming needs, visit ATFO and sign up TODAY! | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
| [All dates in (PT) time] | Threads List « Next Newest Next Oldest » |
| PAGES: «prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 next» |
Powered by neoforums v0.9.8b (equilibrium)
Copyright Neo Era Media, Inc. 1999-2009