---

3DMark 2001
1.Ares81883- 61,111
2.Courgan- 56,118
3.CrankyOldBastard- 45,663
4.bobbyg2- 41,148
5.Byro- 40,697




3DMark 2003
1.Byro- 55,529
2.Freeze- 49,527
3.Courgan- 43,270
4.Ares81883- 40,639
5.CrankyOldBastard- 37,382




3DMark 2005
1.Courgan- 22,943
2.Ares81883- 21,511
3.Cowspoo- 19,485
4.Freeze- 19,341
5.Leenseen- 19,255




3DMark 2006
1.Freeze- 15,379
2.Furnaps- 15,200
3.Ares81883- 14,895
4.Leenseen- 13,571
5.Courgan- 13,404




AquaMark
1.Courgan- 205,461
2.Area81883- 188,673
3.Leenseen- 178,212
4.Entropy- 148,907
5.bobbyg2- 138,753



SuperPi (1M)
1.Courgan- 11s
2. Cowspoo- 14s
3.Guticb- 15s
3.Leenseen- 15s
4.Daimob- 16s
4.Mr_Roboto- 16s
5.The Slayer- 20s



SuperPi (32M)
1.Courgan- 12m10s
2.Cowspoo- 14m30s
3.CrankyOldBastard- 15m10s
4.Mr_Roboto- 15m19s
5.Leenseen- 15m40s



HD Tune: Average Transfer Rate
RAID
1.Courgan- Seagate Baracuda RAID 0- 119.0 MB/S
2.Leenseen- Seagate 7200.10 250GB RAID 0- 113.2 MB/S
3.Cowspoo- Seagate 7200.10 250GB 3.0Gb/s RAID 0- 108.2 MB/S
4.Mr_Roboto- Samsung SpinPoint P Series 120GB 7200 RAID 0- 84.9 MB/S
5.

Single Drive
1.Mr_Roboto- Seagate Barracuda 500GB SATA 7200/32MB/SATA-3G- 84.6 MB/S
2.Ares81883- Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 250GB- 79.7 MB/S
3.CrankyOldBastard- 74gb WD Raptor- 74.6 MB/S
4.Daimob- Seagate 250GB- 64.1 MB/S
5.Jesh- Seagate Barracuda 500GB 62.2 MB/s

---

To submit an entry:

Post your bench scores along with a screenshot in your worklog thread first.

Then post in this thread with the bench name, score and a link to the "proof post" from your worklog thread. You can find the direct link to a specific post by clicking/hovering over this icon to the right of each post~()

One placement per person per benchmark.

If you do not have a worklog at the time of your entry, you will need to provide a link to a post from somewhere on Neoseeker that gives the benchmark score and details any relative system specs that are not presented in the benchmark(s) screenshot. Please post
these in the appropriate location so they do not get deleted.

Entries based on "good faith" without a proof screenshot somewhere to back them up will not be added to the board.

As more people enter, the place spots will fill and the lowest will drop out after all placements are filled, as well as the number 5 spot dropping out with each additional entry that is better than the last.

I've got just the basic benchmarks listed until we can get some collaboration on additional benches in this thread: Link.

*NEW*

HD Tune is added to the scoreboard. The same rules apply as before. You must link to a post in your worklog(a direct link to a hosting site is no good). The catch here is that many of us have multiple drives. If you fall into the RAID category you will be entered there. Likewise for single drive. If you have RAID and a single drive you may enter both categories. If you have two different RAID configurations or two different independent drives, you will only be listed once so show your highest score.

To make this easier on me, list your HDD set-up in the same post in your worklog that the screenshot is in. This way I will know which category you fall into without having to do research for every entry.


Downloads:
3DMark 01, Alternate
3DMark 03, Alternate
3DMark 05, Alternate
3DMark 06, Alternate
Aquamark, Alternate
SuperPi, Alternate
HD Tune, Alternate



This message was edited by The Slayer(moderator) on Mar 31 2009.

Aquamark- 110,676
3DMark 03- 26,324
3DMark 06- 8064

Super PI (1M): 20s

Super PI (32m): 18m,07s



This message was edited by the slayer on Aug 22 2007.

3dMark 03 - 16,584
3Dmark 05 - 7,898
3dMark 06 - 4762
Aquamark - 69,209
Super Pi (1M) - 48s
Super Pi (32m) 32m, 19s


Edit: This thread sucks. It hurt my Pentium 4's feelings.

This message was edited by guticb on Aug 25 2007.

3DMark'01- 33,808

SuperPi 1M- 30s

SuperPi 32M- 28m18s

This message was edited by Anonymous on Dec 09 2007.

I'll have some more results up soon. I'll gun for an entry in each category.

3dMark06 - 10441

Aquamark3 - 136 670

Edit:

3dMark05 - 15440

This message was edited by ParanahJoe on Dec 10 2007.

Here we go, proof (screenshots) can be found on the first post of my [Showcase]

• 3DMark 01: 32,392 3DMarks
  
• 3DMark 03: 24,704 3DMarks
  
• 3DMark 05: 14,904 3DMarks
  
• 3DMark 06: 9,315 3DMarks
  
• Aquamark: 148,907

I ran SuperPI a while ago, but I don't have it installed any more and didn't keep any screens. I'll rerun it tomorrow.

I just shattered the SuperPi records.

1m: 16 seconds
32m: 17m 2s

Proof

What cpu you got i just got 16mins 16 secs on the 32m super pi. Get round 11000 in 3dmark 06

quote helpreere

What cpu you got i just got 16mins 16 secs on the 32m super pi. Get round 11000 in 3dmark 06

http://www.neoseeker.com/forums/36554/t952422-guticbs-tamed-beast-overclocked/

Never mind last post noticed on screen you have quad, i've got the E6850 running at 3.8ghz. I can put up some screens if you want. get 14 secs in 1m super pi

3DMark03: 52057

3DMark 06: 11648

3DMark06: 12730

Cowspoo, you are not included in the update and the other updated links need to be changed by the recent participants for the following reason:

Proof screenshots must be direct linked to the post on Neoseeker that contains them. An imageshack link isn't going to work out in the long run. Imageshack drops links every so often, it's easy to copy and paste someone else's screenshot URL, and it would be less confusing for everyone involved if a timeline was parallel to the proof shots.

Update your worklog threads with the screenshots as if it was just another post, then alter/add to your first post of your worklog with the new information(Old scores don't matter as you are only allowed one placement per category). Direct link to the post that has the updated information...do not direct link to imageshack or the first post of your worklog.

Cowspoo, this concerns you as you do not even have a worklog thread yet and have not linked to a post on Neoseeker that contains the information you are providing. Create a worklog thread and adjust your linkage and you will most certainly be added to the list. The rest of you, your links need to be changed(and noted within your edited post) so that they do not get deleted once imageshack decides to drop them.