Who thinks call of duty 5 (world at war) should have been an extension of call of duty 4 (modern warfare). it's just very very stupid that they've went back to the clunky 1940'2 hardware when they could use real life army campaigns to make COD 5.

It doesn't really matter, WaW for the DS is essentially a continuation of the core game of MW anyway.

Plus, we get the traditional CoD experience on the DS.

i really dont think it is just a continue of MW, as your back to the pan helmets and the clucky 1940's hardware, which is really heavy and ineffective, and unefficient. i mean come on really COD5 should be in modern situations I.E. iraq, i mean come on that would have been fun.

mission briefing: steal oil, come on man that would be fun fighting sadam.

Then look forward to CoD6, a return to modern warfare. A bit sketchy at the moment whether it'll be available for the DS, though.

CoD5 is beast.

Too bad it isn't COD5. It's JUST Call of Duty: World at War. Nowhere official has it say 'Call of duty 5: World at War'. Just Call of Duty: World at War. COD5, I'm fairly certain, IS going to be another Modern Warfare type thing.