Seeing everyone creating threads like these with cool names I decided to make one too.

My most primitive review (the one for Bully) is not very elaborated. The others are fine. The best review IMO was the one for Hitman: Blood Money. I tried to convert the whole game into words. So what do you think of my reviews?

Good job on keeping the flow of your reviews, as well as making sure that you got both fact and opinion in there. The last bit might sound odd, but more often than not a lot of reviews go through which are more essays on what they were rather than reviews on what they thought. You did a great job of keeping that balanced.

Also, I personally like reviews which don't have a lot of videos and pictures, so good work from me on that as well. =D

Thanks Mishy.

I just read your Hitman: Blood Money review and it was very good. You elaborated on the gameplay, sights and sound enough, and as Mishtram had already stated, you have a good flow during your reviews. The video was oddly placed though, at the end of the review. Also, I'm curious of the replay value of it, as in is it still fun a second time through, is there a substantial amount of modes/missions that will keep you entertained for months, maybe even years? Other than that, it was a really good review, nice job!

I placed the trailer at the end as a finishing touch.

As for replay value, considering the number of methods by which you can complete each mission, it will keep you entertained for a few years.

quote Kokoro

I read your Bully review and it's short, but pretty nice. But I wouldn't consider any of the weapons to be "cartoony". But I do agree that they should have had more exploration.

A rocket-bottle-launcher, crackers the size of a dynamite, stink bombs in a huge round-bottomed flask, a scoped slingshot... Not cartoony you say?