| PAGES: 1 2 next» |
|
| |
Smoke N a Pancake
|
HDTV Tech Discussion. |
|
Well it's certainly the most popular debate among people interested in HD appliances, so there's no better place for that discussion than the HD forum. ------------------- ![]() The World is Yours | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del report
| |
| Members, log in or register to remove these ads. | |
KolothI travel the river of blood
(moderator) General Playstation 3 Intellectual Exchanges ![]() ![]() total posts: 15522 since: Nov 2002 |
re: LCD vs. Plasma |
|
I think ultimately the things that made me pick LCD was the way I use my TV. Plasma just aren't designed to be used all day every day. They are far more prone to burn in and they have a shorter expected lifespan. Plus they produce a more heat. ------------------- ![]() Education Forum|Books & Literature Forum | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del report
| |
Guugley
|
re: HDTV Tech Discussion. |
|
This page tested both of them and out of 12, LCD got 8. I don't really mind which one's better tbh, they're both pretty good. | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del report
| |
Darknet
|
re: HDTV Tech Discussion. |
|
Yes, DLP is a good choice. My parents got a 56in DLP and it looks amazing, but I still like my LCD more. ------------------- Maybe a mystic with fortunes to tell | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del report
| |
Smoke N a Pancake
|
re: HDTV Tech Discussion. |
|
I did leave DLP out, but realistically oLED really isn't that much of a discussion point yet because it's still so expensive (and limited in size). As far as the normal consumer goes, it's really all about DLP, LCD, and Plasma. ------------------- ![]() The World is Yours | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del report
| |
The SlayerAchiever
(moderator) General Computer Hardware & Overclocking Retail PC's Showcases and Work Logs ![]() ![]() ![]() total posts: 8471 since: May 2003 |
re: HDTV Tech Discussion. |
|
I think you should add DLP to the topic too. ------------------- quote Avalith | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del report
| |
KolothI travel the river of blood
(moderator) General Playstation 3 Intellectual Exchanges ![]() ![]() total posts: 15522 since: Nov 2002 |
re: HDTV Tech Discussion. |
quote smoke N a pancakeTrue, but it is an interesting technology with many advantages. It will be a big player when manufacturing costs are reduced. ------------------- ![]() Education Forum|Books & Literature Forum | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del report
| |
Smoke N a Pancake
|
re: HDTV Tech Discussion. |
|
If we put everything into one thread then that really limits the discussion opportunities for the rest of the forum. I added them anyways, but it may not be a bad idea to make a separate thread for oLED technology. ------------------- ![]() The World is Yours | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del report
| |
KolothI travel the river of blood
(moderator) General Playstation 3 Intellectual Exchanges ![]() ![]() total posts: 15522 since: Nov 2002 |
re: HDTV Tech Discussion. |
|
Well nothing saying we can't have seperate threads to discuss each one. There are things such as setup and technologies that are more easily discussed in a seperate thread rather than in a comparison thread. ------------------- ![]() Education Forum|Books & Literature Forum | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del report
| |
Daimob
|
re: HDTV Tech Discussion. |
|
what is the DLP technology? ------------------- Black sabbath were OWNAGE [img][/img] | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del report
| |
Darknet
|
re: LCD vs. Plasma vs. DLP (and oLED discussion) |
|
DLP uses projection, which makes it better sometimes. Though it can be bulky. ------------------- Maybe a mystic with fortunes to tell | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del report
| |
Redemption
|
re: LCD vs. Plasma vs. DLP (and oLED discussion) |
quote KolothI think current generation plasma's have a half life of 60,000hrs (I assume half life is the time for the plasma phosphor to become around 50% as bright as their original brightness), and Panasonic claims to have gotten theirs up to 100,000hrs. A person can use their plasma for around 20 yrs @8hrs a day before it really dies. Most ppl don't even keep their CRT's that long and I'm pretty sure most people don't watch 8hrs of TV every single day. At 100,000hrs of half life its more like 30yrs. Plasma technology is improving remarkably fast too. Not to mention it inherently has no ghosting issues that LCD's have (plasma has a refresh time of 0.2ms or something ridiculously low like that). LCD's with 120Hz (more and more common) refresh probably solve all these problems but I'm not sure. I also think burn in is less of a concern nowadays. But IR (Image Retention) is still a big enough risk that you have to watch your usage habits (a huge turnoff). Still, even IR is much better in current generation products. Maybe in a few years IR will become even less of an issue, but I think Plasmas will always be prone to uneven wear of phosphors, there's just nothing that can be done about it. The future is probably going to be OLED and LCD's with locally dimmable LED backlights, though I understand some cool plasma concepts were shown at CES this year ------------------- The further back you can look, the farther ahead you can see. <paraphrased> - Winston Churchill | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del report
| |
KolothI travel the river of blood
(moderator) General Playstation 3 Intellectual Exchanges ![]() ![]() total posts: 15522 since: Nov 2002 |
re: HDTV Tech Discussion. |
|
Well I bought mine last year. At that time the cons against Plasma were still pretty prevailent. But on top of that not a lot of Plasma are even made in the 32" range. ------------------- ![]() Education Forum|Books & Literature Forum | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del report
| |
Smoke N a Pancake
|
re: HDTV Tech Discussion. |
|
I believe that an expensive enough LCD between 20-26" actually can have low enough as 2ms response time (I know my 22" monitor does, but I'm not sure on the specifics for actual television sets). ------------------- ![]() The World is Yours | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del report
| |
Redemption
|
re: LCD vs. Plasma vs. DLP (and oLED discussion) |
quote KolothYeah current day LCD's have very little ghosting, its more about motion blur, and that's almost non existent. A 32" TV is less likely to have motion blur than a larger one I think. I doubt its a problem for 90% of users. I'm not against LCD's or anything, I was with a friend just a few weeks ago who was shopping for a Sony Bravia and we had a great time staring at them all and doing research. I'm just adding to the conversation Btw, plasmas have had the same total "lifetime" as LCD's under normal use conditions since late 2006 I believe. Anyone who tells you otherwise is quoting way old information from 2004-2005. Plasma's unfortunately are still "dimmer" than LCDs and when run in torch mode probably don't last as long. Other cons against plasma would be their naturally more reflective screens - the combination of lower brightness and reflective screens make plasmas less ideal for daytime viewing. This message was edited by Redemption on Jan 11 2008. ------------------- The further back you can look, the farther ahead you can see. <paraphrased> - Winston Churchill | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del report
| |
| [All dates in (PT) time] | Threads List « Next Newest Next Oldest » |
| PAGES: 1 2 next» |
Powered by neoforums v0.9.4 (equilibrium)
Copyright Neo Era Media, Inc. 1999-2008