|
| |
Random kid
|
Review of game |
|
Many games magazines have said this game isn't worth buying for the gameplay and have said that all empires games they make are the same but they just add a new feature to it calling it new eg:
Judging by the amount of new content, this is more of a stop-gap than a sequel. Hardcore fans will be best off waiting for the next instalment, because this add-on feels desperately half-hearted. A tired sequel with no real improvements. This review is from OXM magazine and i am a fan of the magazine but some great games get really rubbish reviews and I think people miss out on a good game if they buy games that the magazines say are "good" and don't buy them if they are "bad" so I say buy this game because it is worth getting. DON'T MISS OUT!. This message was edited by Random kid on Sep 02 2009. ------------------- ![]() | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
Mr Gray
|
re: Review of game |
|
Less than stellar, more of the strategic element has been removed (so why are we calling it an Empires game again?), and though the CAW feature has been upped slightly, the lack of strategy in an otherwise completely redundant hack and slash, doesn't make it anything you should jump for joy over.
Ironically, having more fun playing Bladestorm. That game seems to get the original working formulat that Kingdom Under Fire on the Xbox had, right on at least enough areas to count. Too bad the game is pretty tough to find. ------------------- ![]() | |
quote quick quote edit quick edit del posts in thread report
| |
| [All dates in (PT) time] | Threads List « Next Newest Next Oldest » |
Powered by neoforums v0.9.8b (equilibrium)
Copyright Neo Era Media, Inc. 1999-2009