I was reading the rules regarding what is acceptable within signatures earlier, and it hit me that they may not be being enforced.

I'll use DragoniteBallZ's signature as an example.



Now, let's take a look at the rules:

quote

Blatant images of a sexual and distasteful nature, including one or more parties engaging in touching/fondling of body parts, or alluding to other obscene acts.

I'd say that sig falls under that, as they're in the missionary position, fondling each other. And that's not the only example... Sereph's signature was allowed, yet it featured two people in a similar way.

What I wanna know is... have the rules changed? If so, why is it not documented?

Cheers to anyone who can clear this up for me.

You have no clue just how many times DragoniteBallZ's banner has been called into question and each time it has been cleared. Is it suggestive? Yes, it is, but it doesn't cross the line according to those in the position (pardon the pun) to decide. BTW: Any fondling you see in that image is clearly your imagination at work.

Granted deciding what has and has not crossed the line is frequently subjective. When it doubt, feel free to contact an active Super Moderator (preferably with a link to the image in question so they don't have to go hunt it down themselves) and they will be happy to share their perspective on the matter.

They are in bikinis. You cannot see any body parts. They are not fondling each other as such.

Do you have anything against homosexuality?