Forum Options:	my.neoforum register members prefs search faq

Thread Recap (last 10 posts from newest to oldest)

Oct 30, 08 09:29AMCricky

I love the game. It's got great storyline and graphics. The gameplay is good.
Now i respect your opinion it may not be your sort of game but you can't go round saying its shit.
Everyone is entitled to their own opinion.

Oct 30, 08 08:21AMLegendaryLegend

quote Star_Wars_Fanatic
If you play a game just for the graphics..then you aren't playing the game.

BiA:HH isn't a Call of Duty kind of game. It's harder to go Rambo for a reason, so you can actually use what the developers made. The squad mechanics, and the surpress features.

Sure, great graphics add to the experiance, but it doesn't mean if a game has mediorce graphics it's INSTANTLY 'shite'.

Not just the graphics, the game in general looks really poor.

In fact i downloaded the demo a few weeks back, and i was deleting it within about 5 mintutes. It is RUBBISH.

Oct 24, 08 01:09PMSimtastic

quote Star_Wars_Fanatic
If you play a game just for the graphics..then you aren't playing the game.

Agreed, Metal Gear Solid has terrible graphics (although they were good for the time) but it is still one of the best games i have played in all my life.

The graphics ain't bad but i play a game for entertainment and for the story, good graphics is just a bonus.

Oct 10, 08 07:28AMStar_Wars_Fanatic

If you play a game just for the graphics..then you aren't playing the game.

BiA:HH isn't a Call of Duty kind of game. It's harder to go Rambo for a reason, so you can actually use what the developers made. The squad mechanics, and the surpress features.

Sure, great graphics add to the experiance, but it doesn't mean if a game has mediorce graphics it's INSTANTLY 'shite'.

Oct 09, 08 12:14PMLegendaryLegend

So basically i was right in thinking this game is shite?

Because i dont think it looks even in the same league as CoD4, even after coming out nearly a whole year after.

I would prefer Resistance tbh

Oct 02, 08 08:13AMnanobyte

Been playing the game for a few days now, and LegendaryLegend is right about the graphics compared to RFOM. Probably because the other BIA games were really good for Xbox and playstation2 that it makes Hells Highway looks a bit used.
I read in one review there are too many open field environments (which I liked) and it isn't true really, there are a lot more street fights and night scenes.

Sep 12, 08 06:13PMGrievous

It's strange, in some videos the graphics look incredible but in others they don't look impressive at all.

But overall, I'm sorta disappointed in the recent videos. Look at the gameplay videos from E3 two(or three?) years ago and they look smoother and more detailed than some of the newer videos.

Sep 11, 08 07:40PMRe4Killer7

It's like some weird cel/unreal engine coloured type of look

The close ups are well done. I think the graphics look good in a way.

Sep 09, 08 01:58PMLegendaryLegend

Am i the only one that thinks this game looks quite poor?

I watch videos of it and it just looks pretty rubbish, even compared to R:FoM which came out, what, 2 years ago now is it?

Battlefield has awesome graphics, CoD4 has awesome graphics, gameplay and controls, and R:FoM has good gameplay.....but Brother's in Arms cant compare to any of them in any way IMO.

But im yet to see anyone think the same thing

If you do not agree with me, please explain why. I'd like to know what the big fuss is about.

Brothers in Arms: Hell's Highway Forum PC 360 PS3

hideOriginal Post

Sep 09, 08 01:58PMLegendaryLegend

Thread Recap (last 10 posts from newest to oldest)

Oct 30, 08 09:29AMCricky

Oct 30, 08 08:21AMLegendaryLegend

Oct 24, 08 01:09PMSimtastic

Oct 10, 08 07:28AMStar_Wars_Fanatic

Oct 09, 08 12:14PMLegendaryLegend

Oct 02, 08 08:13AMnanobyte

Sep 12, 08 06:13PMGrievous

Sep 11, 08 07:40PMRe4Killer7

Sep 09, 08 01:58PMLegendaryLegend