Neoseeker : News : A potential ban on harddrives and PC's because of some glue.
Hardware Newsletter:
Email:

Latest News
Sun, Oct 12
Sat, Oct 11
Fri, Oct 10
Thu, Oct 09
Wed, Oct 08

send article hardware newsletter   article comments (7)

A potential ban on harddrives and PC's because of some glue.
J. Micah Grunert - Thursday, October 11th, 2007 | 2:32PM (PT)


Several companies are under investigation because the adhesive used to bond wires in harddrives is patented by someone else.

Computers are getting smaller, therefore, the components used to manufacturer computer hardware shrinks. Case in point; the read/write heads of harddrives. These heads are now so small that the tiny wires that carry the data cannot be soldered into place. Therefore, a type of electrically conductive adhesive is used. Who would have thought that the holders of that patented glue would have petitioned the ITC (International Trade Commission) to investigate, and possible ban these patent infringing drives from ever entering the United States.

The whole issue surround the patent for 'Dissipative Ceramic Bonding Tips' which is held by California residents Steven and Mary Reiber. The method is simply a way to attach ultra-fine wires using pressure rather than solder and heat. The Reibers' are claiming that the likes of Western Digital, Seagate, Toshiba, Hewlett-Packard and Dell are all guilty of patent infringement. Certainly, those would manufacturer harddrive using this patented bonding method are, and apparently those who would sell PC's that use these harddrives are guilty as well. Using this method of manufacture violates the U.S. Tariff Act of 1930, specifically that of section 337 which states that it is illegal to import a good into the United States that infringes upon the patent, trademark, copyright and or intellectual property of the U.S.       

The same had happened with Qualcomm last June when the ITC slapped a ban on the import of their EVDO chips, circuit board modules, and handsets that infringed upon patents held by the competing company Broadcom. That incident sparked an uprising amongst mobile carrier companies - AT&T, T-Mobile, Verizon, and Sprint - who used Qualcomm parts in their phones. Eventually, the US Court of Appeals sided with Qualcomm and lifted the ban after many trade groups stated that such a ban would stifle competition and hurt millions of consumers.

And though this could have potential serious repercussions, the ITC is still reviewing the matter and will not decide upon a definate course of action for at least another month. 

It's quite likely though that nothing will come of this. Western Digital, Seagate, Toshiba, Hewlett-Packard and Dell are tech industry giants, and a ban of their products for some quibbling over what is essentially a pressure sensitive glue, a ban on harddrives could bring an entire nation (citizens, government, industry, business, military, etc.) to its knees.

Where else are we going to store our MP3's?

back to news    comments or corrections
- This news story is archived and is closed to comments now -

Comments:

October 11th, 2007 4:20PM(PT)
Sort
I don't see how this ban could ever be enforced. Maybe a reimbursement of some sort could be instituted but nothing more.
October 11th, 2007 4:28PM(PT)
MicahWrites
I'll never happen. If it did, then American companies could claim that off-shore websites are using their patented property and insist that the Internet is a form of import, demanding that the ITC filter the Web to block these infringing sites.

It's just another cash grab from a patent holder wanting money for something that should be in the public domain.
October 12th, 2007 9:59AM(PT)
iamjoe56
Even if they get this to coaut, what in the flippin *bleep* do they hope to accomplish!?! The lawyers that those companies caould bring into the court would eat those people for BREAKFAST! Also, if they hold the patent on it, why not have the msupply a patent number? This is such a load of bullshit...
October 12th, 2007 10:00AM(PT)
iamjoe56
Sorry for the typo. "court" and "could".
October 13th, 2007 11:53AM(PT)
ariasius
the patent is held by two American citizens, California residents Steven and Mary Reiber, therefore the ITC is protecting the rights of Americans. what's wrong with that? It's only because the American computer companies have their products made outside of US that causes "imports" impossible. read the story before you make a comment, please.
October 13th, 2007 2:17PM(PT)
MicahWrites
I agree that protecting the rights of the patent, trademmark and or copyright holder is an important issue. In this case however, the patent holders should try to work with those other companies in the hopes of reaching a fair and amicable solution.

Unfortunatlly, it is likely that all the parties involved are simply looking at their dollar figures and trying to save/make all the money they can.

Pardom me for quoting this but, "Can't we all just get along?"
October 14th, 2007 4:54PM(PT)
iamjoe56
Indeed, Micah. The big thing with this is that these people crawled out of the woodwork and filed a lawsuite, I do not care if it is over a patent or not, THAT should have this whole flippin thing discounted. Second, if they hold the patent, why are the companies using it? Most big companies try to avoid lawsuites (Sony not withstanding) and check patents for this kind of stuff. Also, the other issue with this, is that for these companies to be using it, it had to have been realeased into the PUBLIC domain. Therefore, this lawsuite is void. Period, rights or not. If they didn't want people using it,then don't release it!

- This news story is archived and is closed to new comments now -

  RSS Feeds

Latest Comments
Most Comments

Latest Net Reviews:
Latest Inhouse:


Compare Prices

Motherboards
 Abit
 ASUS
 Gigabyte
 Intel
 iWill
 Shuttle
 Soyo
 Super Micro
 Tyan
 More...

Processors
 AMD
 Intel
 More...

Memory
 SDRAM
 RDRAM
 DDRAM
 More...

Video Cards
 ATI
 Visiontek
 PNY
 3Dfx
 More...

search for lowest prices
(0.0218/mc/ascension)