Neoseeker : News : Official Xbox Magazine replaces cover with advertisement
Hardware Newsletter:
Email:

Latest News
Thu, Aug 28
Wed, Aug 27
Tue, Aug 26
Mon, Aug 25

send article   article comments (11)

Official Xbox Magazine replaces cover with advertisement
Sean Ridgeley - Wednesday, April 16th, 2008 | 11:05AM (PT)


Future Publishing all about the benjamins

Official Xbox Magazine replaces cover with advertisement Image 1

Reason #8,000,000 I don't trust Wikipedia:

"The Official Xbox Magazine is dedicated to review every single Xbox, Xbox 360, Xbox Live Arcade, downloadable content, and expansion pack title that ever comes out no matter how small or unpopular the game is."

Contrast that with the latest "cover" of Official Xbox Magazine (pictured above) and you'll see what I'm talking about. It features a full-blown ad for Rainbow Six Vegas 2, serving as a psuedo-cover, hiding the "real" one which features Fallout 3. Also, the back cover features an ad from a second Ubisoft game, Tom Clancy's FutureWar, to be released this fall.

"There's a two-page spread for Rainbow Six Vegas 2 not even twenty pages into the magazine," says Tim Rogers of gaming site insert credit. "Magazines have been figuratively selling their covers to the highest bidder for years now. This is the first time, to my knowledge, that a magazine did so literally."

Ubisoft, by the way, is the same company that decided EGM's coverage of Assassin's Creed was "the last straw" and decided to pull ads and coverage from the magazine. Future Publishing is the same company that publishes Nintendo Power, as well.

Some of you may be wondering why I care about this at all. Well, there are some lines in journalism, and some of them, if only for the sake of preserving integrity and proving honesty (sad people have to do this nowadays, but, y'know), shouldn't be crossed. Journalism has long had a funny little relationship with advertising; a fair portion of us have a sort of 'I'll put up with you because we're roomates and this place is great for the price' kind of relationship with it. Therefore, when advertising actually overtakes the actual content of the magazine (in more ways than one), that's the equivalent of your roomate setting up shop in your room. Your room! It's about not putting a dollar sign on every thing on this planet, as social commentator Bill Hicks would say. You want some ads? Fine. We'll help get the word out. You help us, we help you, hopefully people will make up their own minds about the ads, and we'll all be alright. But this? Why should I trust OXM after this? If they're willing to sell off the covers, why not the content?

back to news    comments or corrections
- This news story is archived and is closed to comments now -

Comments:

April 16th, 2008 11:27AM(PT)
RabidChinaGirl
They're doing the same thing as they were doing before, just being more obvious about it now (more or less what the second quote said, who did you quote, anyway?).

I don't see what the problem is. The magazine itself is geared toward a certain demographic, and the games they advertise will be toward that group as well. The group is already inclined to buy it, and would be interested in that product.

It's not like the ad is telling you to buy crack or punch babies.
April 16th, 2008 11:33AM(PT)
chautemoc
quote
..who did you quote, anyway?
See above.

The problem (and of course, this is just one opinion) is that it's not honest. What if the game is s***? Because this coverage is there simply because it's bought, it tells me nothing other than when the game is coming out, essentially.

Does it deserve all that extra coverage? Should it be allowed to have it simply because it can be bought? That's a lot of space that could be spent on games that actually deserve it, or deserve it more, anyway.
April 16th, 2008 11:38AM(PT)
DeathMonkey
Ok the front cover should never be an advertisement, the back cover is fine but the front cover is supposed to tell me whats in the magazine or something.
April 16th, 2008 11:51AM(PT)
RabidChinaGirl
You quoted Wikipedia, then?

No advertisement tells anyone if the game is bad or good, no matter what type of ad it is. It's an ad. It's supposed to get you to buy it. And I dunno about you, but I don't suddenly get up and go buy a game just because of a snazzy advertisement. At least, not without doing research on my own.

If anyone is so easily influenced by advertising, well, they deserve to be throwing their money away.
April 16th, 2008 11:54AM(PT)
chautemoc
You said the second quote. =/

Right..which is why anything more than a two-page ad is essentially useless. It's also undeserving of a cover, not only because that essentially demeans all other coverage in the magazine.

Indeed.
April 16th, 2008 12:00PM(PT)
RabidChinaGirl
Tim Rogers. I see it now. Well, I've never had much respect for Tom Clancy, so the ad means very little to me (yeah, I guess they could find a better game to advertise, at least).

When I look at magazine covers, they already look like advertisements, though. Usually, the cover tells you briefly what the magazine features, so it's advertising for both the 'zine and the games.

This full page thing is like a switch off, I think. The magazine isn't advertising for itself anymore, so the ad is essentially targeting those who already buy the 'zine on their own or regularly.
April 16th, 2008 12:03PM(PT)
chautemoc
Well I guess we have different definitions of advertising..I see what you mean, but I dont consider it advertising, more or less a table of contents. By that definition every table of contents and synopsis of every book/movie/whatever everywhere is an ad. And I wouldn't argue you against you if you believed that, I would just believe different.
April 16th, 2008 12:11PM(PT)
Wolfwood
Indeed, most gaming rag covers pretty much are advertisements for software both current and upcoming. This is probably Future's roundabout way to milk even more bucks from covers... by actually making them full page ads.

It's like the free newspapers being distributed here in Vancouver these days. All the daily local/international coverage... after flipping past that glaring front page ad for insurance/travel/breath mints!
April 16th, 2008 1:53PM(PT)
Vito Raliffe
This article has been mentioned on Destructoid
April 16th, 2008 1:54PM(PT)
chautemoc
Thanks for the heads up. Nice to see.
April 16th, 2008 2:09PM(PT)
kspiess
Having this ad is not in the magazine's best fiancial interests, in my opinion. Cover is all about enticing people to pick the mag up off the racks. I can't see this ad jumping out at people in stores... most of us have pretty good ad-filtering vision I think
April 16th, 2008 9:48PM(PT)
James Walker
kspiess:
I can tell you for a fact that these advertising covers aren't on retail stores. At least, not any I've seen.

- This news story is archived and is closed to new comments now -

  RSS Feeds

Latest Comments
Most Comments
Latest Net Reviews:
Latest Inhouse:


Compare Prices

Motherboards
 Abit
 ASUS
 Gigabyte
 Intel
 iWill
 Shuttle
 Soyo
 Super Micro
 Tyan
 More...

Processors
 AMD
 Intel
 More...

Memory
 SDRAM
 RDRAM
 DDRAM
 More...

Video Cards
 ATI
 Visiontek
 PNY
 3Dfx
 More...

search for lowest prices

(0.0718/d/aeon)